Lost in translation: A gentle guidance about GHP scientific terminology

(for readers who believe precision is not pedantry — it’s public service) It’s a truth universally acknowledged that English‑language vaccine papers are often written by those who do not think in English — and occasionally, one suspects, not even about vaccines. To save humanity and editors alike from terminological despair, GHP humbly offers this field guide to frequently mangled concepts. I apologize — my father was a teacher, so over‑explaining is in my DNA. 1. Vaccines are not aspirins Let’s begin with the basics. A vaccine is a licensed product. Until it’s licensed, it’s a vaccine candidate, not a pipeline miracle or magic potion in Phase 2. And please — no more calling vaccines drugs. Aspirin is a drug. Vodka is a drug. Vaccines are biologicals. Every time someone writes “drug development” instead of “vaccine development,” a regulatory official loses a small piece of their soul. 2. Immunity, protection, and other subtle distinctions Immunity is...